![]() ![]() This IATA Guidance Material will be revised, whenever significant changes need to be introduced and/or to include additional aircraft types. IATA (International Air Transport Association) recommends fuel tank monitoring depending on location and experience, but at least once in a year 1. The reasons for these differences are discussed in detail. A recommended Aircraft Refuel Sheet has also been developed by Into-plane Fuelling Companies/Operators, the adoption of which is paramount to the final success of the project. The estimates for the emissions of CO, HC and NO x are 10%, 140% and 30% higher than those predicted by SAGE respectively. The mission fuel burn, CO 2 and H 2O estimates from APMI are approximately 20% lower than those predicted by SAGE for 2006 while the estimate for the total global aircraft SO x emissions is approximately 40% lower. The number of global departures modelled with the APMI software is 8% lower compared with SAGE and reflects the difference between their commercial air traffic statistics data sources. The results from APMI are compared with published estimates obtained using the US Federal Aviation Administration’s System for Assessing Aviation’s Global Emissions (SAGE) for the year 2006. ![]() #Iata fuel program implementation guidance material updateHere, the development of the Aircraft Performance Model Implementation (APMI) software which is used to update global commercial aviation fuel burn and emissions estimates is described. Estimates of global aviation fuel burn and emissions are currently nearly 10 years out of date. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |